quinta-feira, 26 de março de 2015

Germanwings Flight 4U9525: Cockpit security scrutinized after crash revelations



A person moves the switch of the cockpit door locking system inside a flight
 simulator of an Airbus A320, like the one that crashed in the French Alps.
 (Leonhard Foeger/Reuters)
A person moves the switch of the cockpit door locking system inside a flight simulator of an Airbus A320, like the one that crashed in the French Alps.



Related Stories

Germanwings crash probe and recovery
Crash victims include opera singers, high school students


As soon as it was learned that one of the pilots appeared to have been
 deliberately locked out of the cockpit of Germanwings Flight 4U9525 before
 it crashed, attention quickly turned to the security protocols relating to the 
cockpit door that separates the flight deck from the rest of the plane.

Those protocols have steadily evolved over the years, but it was one big event 
almost 15 years ago that changed everything – the 9/11 attacks.

Within weeks, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had mandated
 new standards to strengthen cockpit doors to protect pilots from intrusion and
 small arms fire, even grenades. Most airlines, including Germanwings, 
reinforced their cockpit doors.
Co-pilot put plane into descent, prosecutor says
What we know about co-pilot Andreas Lubitz

But fortifying those doors was just one part of the security upgrade. The FAA
 also required that cockpit doors remain locked during flight.

"The door will be designed to prevent passengers from opening it without the 
pilot’s permission," a 2002 FAA release said. "An internal locking device will 
be designed so that it can only be unlocked from inside the cockpit."
'The most plausible, realistic interpretation … is that the co-pilot … refused to
 open the door of the cabin to the captain.'- Brice Robin, French prosecutor

That's where things appear to have gone terribly wrong on board the
 Germanwings flight.

Airbus cockpit doors lock by default when they are closed. An Airbus training
 video shows that the A320 cockpit has procedural safeguards in place in the event 
that one pilot inside the cockpit becomes incapacitated while the other is outside,
 or if both pilots inside are incapacitated.

When one of the pilots leaves the cockpit, they can get back in by communicating
 by intercom or buzzer with the person inside. The inside person can peer through
 a peephole or use a camera feed to decide whether to allow that person to enter.
 If there is no answer to a request for access, the person outside can enter an
 emergency keycode to get access. If there is still no response, the door opens
 automatically 30 seconds later.

"There was always the opportunity to open the door from the inside and if that is
 not possible, then you can open the door from the outside via a code," German 
Transport Minister Alexander Dobrindt confirmed Thursday.

But the Airbus video says the person on the inside of the cockpit has the ability to
 specifically deny the emergency access request by pressing an override
 switch that causes the door to do into lockdown mode for five minutes.
 Lufthansa's CEO acknowledged that may be what the co-pilot did in this case.



"There is another code you can actually operate which will also lead to a bell ringing
, and if nobody actually reacts, the door will open electrically and automatically, 
and this can be impeded by those in the cockpit by actually pressing a lever which
 says 'lock' and the doors will be closed for five minutes," Lufthansa CEO Carsten 
Spohr told a news conference.



"It seems to be true that the colleague who remained in the cockpit, the co-pilot,
 denied him access back into the cockpit in order to start the fatal descent in the
 French Alps," he said.

"The most plausible, realistic interpretation as far as we are concerned is that
 the co-pilot – through voluntary abstention, through voluntary abstention –
 refused to open the door of the cabin to the captain, and pressed the button
 which caused the aircraft to lose altitude," French prosecutor Brice Robin said.


Canadian airlines make changes

Many U.S. airlines have a "rule of two" that requires that if one pilot leaves the 
cockpit, another crew member, such as a flight attendant, must replace them in 
the cockpit.

This is not an FAA requirement. Lufthansa, owner of the downed Germanwings
 plane, does not have such a rule, nor is it required to follow such a practice.

Dominic Fouda, a spokesman for the European Aviation Safety Agency,
 told CBC News that regulators there do not require two people in the cockpit
 at all times.

But as a matter of airline policy, several European airlines, including Finnair,
 do require two people to be in the cockpit whenever a flight is airborne. Norwegian
 Air Shuttle, Europe's third largest budget airline, announced Thursday it would
 also adopt the rule requiring two crew members to always be present in the cockpit.

Norwegian spokeswoman Charlotte Holmbergh-Jacobsson said the new rules
 will be in place "as soon as possible" on all commercial flights globally.

In Canada, Air Canada and Air Transat both said they would now ensure that there
 are always two people in the cockpit at all times on their flights.

"Following initial reports on the Germanwings accident, we are implementing

 without delay a policy
change to ensure that all flights have two people in the cockpit at all times,
" Air Canada said in a statement to CBC News.

Air Transat's move to a "rule of two" in its cockpits will be in effect as of Friday, 
spokeswoman Debbie Cabana told AFP.

With files from The Associated Press
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/germanwings-flight-4u9525-cockpit-security-scrutinized-after-crash-revelations-1.3010494

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário